Posts Tagged ‘Outcomes’

60 NHS Outcome Measures announced

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

The Health Secretary Andrew Lansley announced plans today which will see NHS Trusts and  clinicians judged against a set of 60 new goals to assess treatment success based on the quality of care patients receive.

The 60 benchmarks that will replace the current system of targets are designed to save more than 24,000 lives a year. The benchmarks are divided into five “domains” which outline NHS responsibilities:

1. Preventing people from dying prematurely
2. Enhancing quality of life for people with long term conditions
3. Helping people to recover from episodes of ill health or following injury
4. Ensuring that people have positive episodes of care
5. Treating and caring for people in a safe environment and protecting them from avoidable harm

Lansley asserts that as a result of these goals, fewer people with long-term conditions including asthma and diabetes will be treated in hospitals. Furthermore, while undergoing routine hip and knee operations will no longer be left in pain or unable to walk and access to NHS dentists will also be improved.

It has been reported that for many diseases (including cancer), Britain’s survival rates lag behind other countries, which is one of the primary drivers Lansley states is behind this new objective. He also points to internal audits showing that NHS treatment often does not provide a solution to a problem. He states one audit as an example which stated that almost half of patients who had a knee replacement did not experience a reduction in pain or an increase in mobility.

Next week, the Government will set out current performance for each of the 60 indicators and then outline national targets for improvement “by the time of the next election and beyond”.

Alongside these outcome measures, data on hospital death rates, the individual performance of clinicians and patients’ experiences under their care are to also be published in an attempt to improve standards. Ministers hope that the detailed publication of the information will force up standards and encourage patients to choose not to be treated at institutions with below-average performance.

The new NHS Commissioning Board and the Care Quality Commission will intervene directly to address problems that are highlighted by the data.

The benchmarks will be monitored partly through studying clinical data and through surveying patients to gauge whether they were satisfied by the standard of care they received and the speed of their recovery.

In addition to patents themselves, the views of bereaved relations and children will also be surveyed so that the quality of NHS care from early years until death can be fully assessed.

Original Source The Telegraph

About Pathway Software

Pathway Software (www.pathwaysoftware.com) specialises in the design and development of patient information systems for Allied Health professionals.

Its flagship product, Therapy Manager, is an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system specifically designed for Therapy Services to provide decision makers with the ability to track and manage clinical activity and analyse cost of care by patient, episode or service. The system also demonstrably reduces administration time and the costs of managing Therapy Services.

PROMs and Outcome Measures – what could you be doing?

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

PROMs

Following feedback from our Expert User Meeting, the resounding feeling from NHS managers and clinicians alike was that the climate surrounding outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) was a very uncertain one. Despite this lack of clarity, all NHS Trusts are being asked to be prepare for a move away from centrally driven process targets and instead will be required delivering against the patient-centred outcomes.

What are you being asked for?

The NHS Outcomes Framework is divided into five “domains” which outline NHS responsibilities:

1. Preventing people from dying prematurely
2. Enhancing quality of life for people with long term conditions
3. Helping people to recover from episodes of ill health or following injury
4. Ensuring that people have positive episodes of care
5. Treating and caring for people in a safe environment and protecting them from avoidable harm

Within these domain sit the 51 overall indicators that departments will be required to submit. Of these, currently only 12 have been developed, but the details of these can be viewed here .

What are the current problems?

There are conflicting messages from different commissioning bodies around what the different departmental requirements are for outcomes. Many Heads of Service are reporting that the outcome indicators required for submission may actual prove too general to be functional for specific areas within Therapies.

A number of PROMs and outcome measures currently exist, although they have not undergone a validation process and in many cases, research has been halted due to lack of funding.

It appears therefore that two sets of measures may ultimately be required; the formal ones for NHS reporting, and informal ones that can help Heads of Service to see how care can be improved in Therapies.

What can you do?

NHS Managers may wish to create questionnaires which emulate the definitions outlined in the Outcomes Framework. These documents can be quickly created in electronic formats and typically will ask patients to choose out of number options or score the support given to them during their treatment.

Statistical analysis of the findings from these questionnaires can then be used to indicate how well services are fulfilling certain indicators, such as “Proportion of people feeling supported to manage their condition”.

With regard to Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), four currently exist for elective procedures including:

  • Hip replacement
  • Knee replacement
  • Varicose veins
  • Groin hernia surgery

Going forward it is expected that others will be developed but as yet they appear to be thin on the ground.

In the mean time, departments may wish to develop their own PROMs as an indicator of treatment success and the patient experience in order to improve care. We have seen examples of Trusts taking the initiative, and creating a PROM where they ask a patient to perform four activities pertinent to their condition. These are scored between 1-10 at the beginning and end of treatment, monitoring progression and the final end result of treatment.

This could help to ensure that patients are seeing improvements in areas that are really important to them, and make sure that departments are well prepared with regards to the production of outcome data.

The second NHS Outcomes Framework published for 2012/13, including levels of ambition where they have been agreed, will be published in January 2012

About Pathway Software

Pathway Software (www.pathwaysoftware.com) specialises in the design and development of patient information systems for Allied Health professionals.

Its flagship product, Therapy Manager, is an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system specifically designed for Therapy Services to provide decision makers with the ability to track and manage clinical activity and analyse cost of care by patient, episode or service. The system also demonstrably reduces administration time and the costs of managing Therapy Services.

NHS Competition not harmful to patients

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

Researchers from the University of York’s Centre for Health Economics have studied the effect of the pro-competition reforms introduced in the 2000s by the Labour government on local communities, stating that the results imply that competition had not negatively affected the NHS.

Similar to the controversy surrounding the current Health and Social Care Bill, critics of the reforms at the time warned that increased competition would lead to hospitals ‘cherry-picking’ the most profitable patients.

Researchers used data on all NHS hospital patients in England to examine whether increased competition had led to increased socio-economic inequality of access to health care. From 2001/2 to 2008/9, researchers found no substantial change in socio-economic patterns of hospital use, either overall or for a number of common hospital services including hip, cataract, heart and gastroscopy procedures.

Evidence was reviewed from three recent econometric studies of the New Labour market, which all show a seemingly causal relation between greater competition and lower hospital mortality. These studies contradicted previous findings that competition in the NHS was largely ineffective, or even had negative consequences.

Project lead Dr Richard Cookson said that the findings also echo similar results from previous research into the Conservative ‘internal market’ reforms of the NHS in the 1990. Cookson stated that neither Conservative nor Labour attempts to introduce competition into the NHS appear to have had any measurable effect on socio-economic equity in healthcare.

The authors also looked at two econometric studies examining the effects of introducing patient choice in elective surgery. The study assumed that this competition would improve elective surgery, which would in turn improve hospital quality. “We believe there are strong grounds for introducing patient choice into the NHS as an end in itself, given its potential to empower patients and give them greater control over the conditions of their care” said Cookson.

Despite these assumptions, the researchers state that little is yet known about how patient choice in elective surgery has affected outcomes. They concluded that “more research is required before conclusions can be drawn about the effect of recent reforms on hospital quality, let alone about the merits of Mr Lansley’s proposals to further extend competition”.

Whether or not competition improves patient outcomes, increased encouragement of patient choice in the type and location of their treatment will mean that ultimately Trusts will need more accurate knowledge of their standards of patient care and the costs associated with treatment. In an attempt to improve clarity around outcomes, Trusts could seek to implement an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) System like Therapy Manager which illustrates the true Costs of Care by speciality and by condition, ensuring that the highest quality patient care is provided at the best price.

Original Source GP Online

About Pathway Software

Pathway Software (www.pathwaysoftware.com) specialises in the design and development of patient information systems for Allied Health professionals.

Its flagship product, Therapy Manager, is an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system specifically designed for Therapy Services to provide decision makers with the ability to track and manage clinical activity and analyse cost of care by patient, episode or service. The system also demonstrably reduces administration time and the costs of managing Therapy Services.

Personal Health Budgets

Wednesday, October 5th, 2011

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley told the Conservative Party conference in Manchester that he will be “truly putting patients at the heart of the NHS” as he announced personal health budgets for 50,000 people.

He stated his commitment to the NHS, asserting that he will never allow the service to become  fragmented, privatised or undermined, and focuses on giving equal access to excellent care.
He states that the NHS will take the freedoms and opportunities that are offered by the Department of Health (DoH) to provide healthcare to the general public, and focus on continually improving the quality of care. “That’s our priority. Our mission. My passion” he said.

Lansley went on to announce that the DoH will offer personal health budgets to the 50,000 people eligible for NHS Continuing Care. These Budgets will give them more control over how their needs are met, allowing them to choose support and services at their discretion. Under this plan, by April 2014 everyone eligible for NHS continuing healthcare will have the right to ask for a personal health budget, including the option of a direct payment.

Patients with long-term conditions would be handed a health budget and be able to buy NHS care or treatments from a private insurer by 2014. The voucher system is being trialled with 1,300 patients, and the DoH is expected to consider the evidence before expanding the scheme.

It was also revealed that the DoH are committed to increasing the NHS budget in real terms every year, which should equate to an additional £12.5 billion by 2015. Since May 2010, it has been reported that there had been more real terms investment in the NHS in areas such as cancer treatment. Furthermore, mixed-sex wards have been abolished, and there have been “radical” reductions in hospital infections.

Commenting on the controversy surrounding the coalition’s reforms have received, in particular the criticisms of the Health and Social Care Bill, Lansley said that they were just a continuation of the changes that the last government had already made and were going to carry on making.

Original Source Public Service

About Pathway Software

Pathway Software (www.pathwaysoftware.com) specialises in the design and development of patient information systems for Allied Health professionals.

Its flagship product, Therapy Manager, is an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system specifically designed for Therapy Services to provide decision makers with the ability to track and manage clinical activity and analyse cost of care by patient, episode or service. The system also demonstrably reduces administration time and the costs of managing Therapy Services.

Success from Individual Back Pain Treatment

Monday, October 3rd, 2011

A new study published in The Lancet’s Online First has found that targeting back care according to the individual person’s needs is far more effective can currently used generic physiotherapy methods.

The STarT Back trial study led by Professor Elaine Hay, looked at whether a stratified approach to managing back pain would be cheaper and more effective than the current practice of offering the same format of treatment to all sufferers. Previous studies have shown that different treatments, including exercise and “cognitive behavioural therapy” (CBT) work well compared to standard care, but so far there has been little evidence to show which treatments would be of most help to which patients.

The results will be significant for the NHS, as it is reported that approximately 49% of the UK population suffer from back pain lasting for up to 24 hours at some point in every year. Figures from Backcare, the back pain charity, state that 80% of people will experience back pain at some time in our lives, which in actual terms costs the NHS annually more than £1 billion.

Current treatment guidelines leave up to 80% of those who see their GP still reporting pain or disability a year after their initial appointment.

The study was carried out at the Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre at Keele University and examined 851 adults with back pain from 10 GP practices across England. An intervention group of 568 patients received stratified care, whilst he remaining 283 in the control group received advice, exercise and manual therapy, following current best practice. The patients were followed up after four months and again at 12 months.

Patients receiving stratified care were screened and placed into three groups based on risk. The low-risk patients had one intervention, which included advice on activity and exercise, and on returning to work. They also received information on local self-help groups, and a video on getting active and a book on back care. People in the medium-risk group had the same initial session and further physiotherapy-led sessions. Those in the high-risk group were referred for psychologically-informed physiotherapy.

Along with an improvement in the levels of back pain-related disability amongst patients, those receiving stratified care also reported other benefits including superior physical and emotional functioning, lower levels of pain, fewer days off work and satisfaction with their treatment. At the 12-month check-up, members of this group were also more likely to report that they were less fearful, less depressed, and in better general health.

An implementation study with GP’s has also been run which has demonstrated that this approach may feasibly work in practice. It has been reported that where GP’s do engage clearly, they find this approach a helpful tool for early decision-making about whether or not to refer. The study indicated that physiotherapists too are keen to use this method, and find it useful to work out the priority of the patient in order to determining how best to go about treatment.

Dr Jonathan Hill, one of the leading academics behind the study says that results of the study were promising. “We weren’t over-treating the people who had a very good prognosis, and that had a beneficial effect for them. And yet we were doing a good job at getting those who really needed treatment through into the services that were going to help them.”

In additional to enhancing the patient experience, the stratified intervention also delivered a saving in costs of £34.39 per patient.

Original Source Saga

About Pathway Software

Pathway Software (www.pathwaysoftware.com) specialises in the design and development of patient information systems for Allied Health professionals.

Its flagship product, Therapy Manager, is an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system specifically designed for Therapy Services to provide decision makers with the ability to track and manage clinical activity and analyse cost of care by patient, episode or service. The system also demonstrably reduces administration time and the costs of managing Therapy Services.

Copyright © 2011 Pathway Software. All rights reserved. Sitemap